Challenges of Small Gene Pools

With our knowledge of genetics today, rare-breed fanciers have the advantage of foresight, and the opportunity to ensure that no single dog becomes too prevalent in the pedigrees of future generations.

I s your breed in trouble? How many founders is it based upon? What is its effective breeding size? Is it on the highway to extinction? Can it be made
healthier?

Every breed is made up of a limited subsection of the entire canine gene pool. Many of these genes are associated with traits important for the function
or appearance of a breed, but even more are hitchhiking along on the same chromosomes as the desirable genes. Some of these hitchhikers are deleterious
genes associated with health problems. Most individuals, whether human or canine, probably carry from three to eight such “bad” genes. Humans have
a huge number of recessive disorders, yet the prevalence of each

one is relatively rare because of the genetic diversity in the human population. Canine breeds tend to have a few recessive disorders, but their prevalence
is often high because of the lack of diversity within each breed. The less diversity there is, the more likely individuals carrying the same recessive
gene will mate, and the more likely it is that some of the progeny will inherit two copies and be affected. In addition, the smaller a population is,
the greater the chance that some good genes will be lost purely by accident because of small sample size. Once lost, they cannot be recovered.

The popularity of a breed doesn’t necessarily correlate with its genetic diversity. A very popular breed may trace back to just a handful of founders,
and so genetically the breed may be comparatively homogeneous. Almost every breed can be considered once rare, as most have relatively, few founders.
The decisions breeders made when creating these breeds are having long-term effects on what is now a huge population. Breeders of today’s rare breeds
are in a better position to avoid the same problems.

No matter how many individual members of a breed are registered, it is only the number of breeding individuals that count toward a breed’s effective population
size. The true effective population size, depends on how many bitches and how many dogs contribute to the next generation, and can be calculated as
((4) x (number males) x (number females)) divided by (number males + number females). For example, say the total population of a breed is 100, but
half of them are neutered or spayed. Of the remaining 50, half are dogs and half are bitches. If each was bred, then the effective population would
be 2,500/50 = 50. But more often, the bitches are bred to only the best of the dogs. If every bitch is bred to one of only five dogs, then the effective
population size sinks to 500/30 = 17. (If math formulas scare you, a good general rule of thumb is that the effective population size can never be
greater than four times the number of males used, and is usually somewhat less; a population with 500 bitches all bred to a single dog has an effective
population size of only four.)

The more all breeders agree on what constitutes the “best” dog, and the easier it becomes to breed to that best dog using chilled semen or airline travel,
the greater the chance of only a comparatively few studs being used, and the smaller the effective population size becomes. The smaller the effective
population size, the less genetic diversity and the greater the chance for expression of deleterious genes will be in future generations. The more
dogs that are passed by for breeding, the greater the chance that those fortunate genes that these dogs may have will be lost to the breed forever.

But what breeder in their right mind would bypass Mr. Wonder Stud to breed to Mr. Ho-Hum or even Mr. Faulty? To do so means sacrificing immediate show
wins, and working toward the betterment of the breed as a whole rather than of one’s own breeding stock. It also means having your fellow breeders
question your sanity and taste. But somebody has to do it.

Then it gets even more difficult: It does little good to breed to Mr. HoHum if everybody with Mr. Wonder Stud’s progeny, realizing they have bred themselves
into a corner, rushes to breed that progeny to Mr. HoHum’s progeny. Within a couple of generations, the breed becomes one big mix of Mr. Wonder Stud
and Mr. Ho-Hum’s genes, with nowhere to go from there.

Optimally, a breed should have distinct lines that descend from unrelated stock. Some subsection of each line would be bred to some dogs from other lines,
but some core lines would remain free of the influence of at least one other line. Unfortunately, this scheme often requires more dogs than a breed’s
popularity can support. In breeds with large litters but few available homes, multiple-sired litters can produce greater genetic diversity within one
litter, enabling the breeder to breed the equivalent of two or three litters with fewer resulting puppies.

Geneticists consider an effective population size of less than 500 to indicate that a species is in danger of extinction. By this criterion, most rare
breeds would be considered in trouble. When a breed is endangered, breeders may be able to scour a breed’s country of origin in search of unrelated
dogs to integrate into the gene pool. In other cases, breeders have resorted to cross-breeding with a similar breed, a practice that is seldom condoned
by kennel clubs.

Some breeders are hesitant to incorporate genes from unknown lines. After all, what genetic problems might be lurking there? True, there is a risk of bringing
in a new set of genetic problems. However, it is better to have lower frequencies of several different harmful recessives than to have a higher frequency
of one single recessive.

The lessons for rare breeds are: Maintain a standard open to interpretation, so that not all breeders have the same vision. Integrate as many dogs into
initial breeding populations as possible. Try to use dogs from as many divergent lines as possible. Don’t give up on a line even though it may not
be a “winner.” Don’t abandon a dog because it has one fault, especially a recessive one for which a carrier test is available. Sometimes bettering
a breed means taking a backseat to winning, in order to favor maintaining genetic diversity for the generations to come.

D. Caroline Code, Ph.D., is a breeder, owner and handler of top-winning Salukis, and the author of 29 books. Send questions to D. Caroline Coile at breedersnote [email protected]

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Pin It on Pinterest

Scroll to Top